INDIA: Feudal lords attack Daliths for claiming proper wage, while police refuse to take action and pressure the victim to withdraw complaint in Uttar Pradesh, India 

INDIA: Feudal lords attack Daliths for claiming proper wage, while police refuse to take action and pressure the victim to withdraw complaint in Uttar Pradesh, India

INDIA: Racial discrimination, murderous assault, corrupt policing, complete failure of rule of law
———————————————————————
Dear friends,

The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) has received information from our local partner PVCHR, a local non-governmental organisation based in Uttar Pradesh detailing that when members of the Dalith community were claiming proper wages for work, they were assaulted by members from the upper caste. Furthermore, when the victims tried to lodge a complaint with the local police, instead of registering it and taking action against the criminals, the police pressurised the victim to withdraw the complaint.

It is alleged that on 24 December 2005 Mr. Guddu, son of Lalman accompanied by Mr. Maya Ram were talking with the Secretary of the Village Panchayat (local body). Maya Ram was discussing with the Secretary about the wages of the labourers who were employed for the construction of a toilet in the scheduled caste area. It is alleged that in fact this Secretary was not paying proper wages to the labourers and Ram and Guddu were protesting against this with the Secretary. It is alleged that the village head, Mr. Sharanshankar Singh (alias Nepali Singh) along with one Mr. Ramesh Yadav came to the place and soon he started verbally abusing Guddu and Ram and also assaulted them with an axe and threatened them that they would be shot. It is also alleged that the injured victim tried to lodge a complaint against the assault with the local police, but they would not accept it. As of today it is allged that the local police are forcing the victim to withdraw the complaint.

The AHRC has in the past raised its concern about the growing intolerance against lower caste members, particularly by the caste Hindus in India. In the recent past the AHRC has issued various urgent appeals on this issue, particularly from Uttar Pradesh, a state where feudal systems still remain unchallenged. In most of these cases the police were reported to be aiding the caste Hindus, refusing to take any action. For further details please see UA-218-2005, HA-23-2005 , UA-145-2005 & UP-100-2005. This is yet another disturbing case of such a nature.

The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) is deeply concerned about this case and calls for your urgent intervention in this case. The incident must be investigated into and the perpetrators booked. The police officers who are responsible for denying the victims to register their case must be immediately removed from their respective posts and their conduct inquired into and charged with for dereliction of duty.

Urgent Appeals Programme
Asian Human Rights Commission
————————————————————-
DETAILED INFORMATION:

Name of the victims:
1. Mr. Guddu, son of Lalman
2. Maya Ram  – both residents of Piyari village within the jurisdiction of Chaubeypur police station, Varanasi district, Uttar Pradesh, India

Date and place of the incident: 24 December 2005, at about 4 pm at Piyari village, Varanasi district, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Perpetrators:
1. Mr. Sharanshankar Singh alias Nepali Singh, son of Mr. Ram Gopal Singh
2. Mr. Ramesh Yadav, son of Mr. Balli Yadav
3. Mr. Jawahar Sav
4. Mr. Bhullan

All residing at Piyari village within the jurisdiction of Chaubeypur police station, Varanasi district, Uttar Pradesh, India

Case details:

On 24 December 2005 at about 4pm Mr. Guddu, son of Mr. Lalman accompanied by Mr. Maya Ram was talking with the Secretary of the Village Panchayat (local body) near the shop of one Mr. Jawahar Sav, son of Satya Narayan Sav at Piyari. Ram was discussing with the Secretary about the wages to be paid to the labourers who were engaged in the construction of a toilet for the scheduled caste area. It is alleged that the Secretary was not paying proper wages to the workers against which Ram and Guddu were protesting with the Secretary.

In the meanwhile the village head, Mr. Sharanshankar Singh (alias Nepali Singh), son of Mr. Ram Gopal Singh accompanied by Mr. Ramesh Yadav, son of Mr. Balli Yadav arrived there. Both Sharanshankar and Ram Gopal soon began to abuse Guddu and Maya Ram and insulted them by refereeing to their caste. Both Sharanshankar and Ram belong to the lower caste otherwise known as the ‘Daliths’ in India. Sharanshankar abused them by saying “you dogs! How dare you ask for wages? Last time I did not teach you a hard lesson. This time I will ruin you. I will shoot you.”

Sharanshankar soon began to assault Guddu which he resisted. At this time Mr. Jawahar Sav and his son Bhullan gave an axe to Sharanshankar with which he assaulted Guddu on his head. Guddu immediately started to bleed. Soon Ramesh Yadav pulled out his local made firearm and threatened Guddu and Ram that they will be shot.

After the incident Guddu and Ram went to the Chaubeypur police station to lodge a complaint. But the police refused to register a case. Finding that the local police unwilling to help them they went to the District Hospital at Kabirchaura for treatment and posted a written complaint with the Superintendent of Police Varanasi. Though the police head received the information he has not initiated any action against the complaint. However, the police are frequenting the victims’ house forcing them to withdraw the complaint.

In this context the AHRC also wish to inform you that the Sharanshankar is also accused of destroying the statue of Dr B. R. Ambedkar (also known as the father of the Indian Constitution and a Dalith by birth) in 2001 and a complaint to this effect was made before the authorities by the PVCHR. In the villages of Eastern Uttar Pradesh attacks on Dalits and practices to insult them in public by the caste Hindus is on the rise. This is perpetrated by the existing feudal landlords who are all against the uprising of the Daliths, who are otherwise considered as the slaves of the caste Hindus.

In this context the AHRC would also like to bring to your attention that according to the Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribes (prevention of Atrocities) Act, it is an offense to verbally abuse a member of the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe with an intention to outrage the person’s modesty. It is a more grave offense to assault a member of the Scheduled Caste or Tribe, which attracts severe punishment from that of a regular Indian Penal Code offense. According to the same Act it is also the duty of the Superintend of Police to be directly responsible to inquire into any complaint of abuse against the members of the lower caste. The Act mandates that any such inquiry must be conducted by an officer not less than the rank of a Deputy Superintend of Police.

Suggested action:
The AHRC is deeply concerned about this case and request your immediate intervention . Please write a letter to the addresses listed below expressing your concern about this case.

 

 

To support this case, please click here: SEND APPEAL LETTER