Dear friends,
The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) has received information from the Food First Information and Action Network Nepal (FIAN Nepal) that the farmers failed to cultivate the seed subsidized by the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) in two hill districts Baitadi and Doti, causing increase of food insecurity. This failure is not the first time and there have been two previous failures this year. 1463 agricultural households were affected whereas the government as well as the FAO has not taken substantial action for compensation. It is alleged that FAO Nepal office distributed the inappropriate seeds for hill area instead of the one the government recommended. However, the government authority has failed to monitor the seed distribution and cultivation. The District Agriculture Department Office is conducting an investigation into the matter and the FAO has acknowledged its responsibility but no steps for compensation for the affected farmers has been taken so far.
CASE NARRATIVE:
In hill districts, the small scaled-farmers possessing less than 0.3 hectares agricultural land have received the seed support subsidized by European Union Food Facility Fund and the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) this year. They are the poorest among the farmers living in Baitadi and Doti districts, who manage food merely by migrating twice a year during off-season; from November to June and from late July to October. They cultivate crops from small land, from which they get little food.
As these farmers find it difficult to manage food for three to six months a year, the government with the support of the FAO and local NGO provides them with the subsidized seed in order to increase the agricultural product from their land. The farmers also believed that the subsidized seeds produce output twice more than the one from local seeds that the farmers used before. However, the failure of seed distribution in time and wrongly adopted seed by the FAO resulted in increasing food insecurity of the poor farmers who could not harvest any crop this year. In addition, it is discovered that the seeds were allegedly distributed more than 10 kilograms earmarked to those who were the relatives of the relevant officers or to those who were not entitled for seed support.
The FAO Nepal office distributed 89 metric tons of paddy seeds to 4633 households of 12 villages in Doti district and 68 metric tons to 6895 households of 36 villages in Batadi district in June 2010. Each household received 10 kilograms of seeds. After the media report on harvest failure in these districts on October 24, the District Agriculture Development Office (DADO) as well as the FAO started conducting an investigation. Till today, 363 households In Doti and 1100 in Baitadi were reportedly affected and more households would be expectedly discovered.
Mr. Shiva Raj Panta (50) living in Patan village of Baitadi district harvested nothing from his land and currently has nothing to eat at home. Before planting rice-seed, he used maize seed subsidized by the FAO which also led to failure. He has observed that some farmers who are allegedly relatives of the officers of the FAO or the German Technical Cooperation (GTZ) who was the partner agency for the seed support programme received 40 kilograms of seeds and those who were not entitled to receive the subsidy got the seed. They allegedly ate the seed as food instead of seeding. Another farmer, Mr. Mahadev Panta (55) testified that received 30 kilograms of rice-seed, which was more than the earmarked. Panta also testified that if we used our local seed, we could have harvested 700 kilograms of rice at the minimum level. However, he harvested nothing from his land this year.
At present, to manage their daily food, farmers try to take a loan from their neighbors or relatives but fail to get it as the festival has been just over. Despite this hazardous situation, the government has not yet taken any substantial step to secure their food security. Both of the FAO office and the DADO have been doing an investigation to identify the affected farmers since late October.
In February 2010, the consultation meeting was held among the DADO, District Project Coordination Committee (DDPC), and the FAO Nepal office. The DADO then recommended two varieties – Khumal 3 and 4 – out of four they listed for hill area. However, the DADO put Sabtri variety as a forth priority variety in the list, which is not even cultivable in hill region and in some reason, the FAO Nepal distributed Sabtri in Baidati district instead of Khumal 3 or 4 recommended by the DADO to the farmers. Sabtri requires about 140 days to be matured with more water as well as high temperature, which is not suitable for hill region but for plain region. In Doti District, the Radha-4 variety was distributed regardless the land level. It was cultivated in low land area but not in high land area.
In addition, the seeds were not distributed in time. According to the agricultural season, May is the best time to plant rice-seeds and thus the farmers can harvest the crop four months later in hill region. Due to strike in May, the seeds distribution was delayed until 1st week of June.
After one meeting regarding seeds support between Ministry of Agriculture and FAO Nepal office in December 2009, the DADO at district level was given the authority to take responsibility for the seeds distribution and monitoring the process. When the (GTZ) informed the DADO of seeds distribution, the DADO did not make an inquiry about the variety for distribution and the GTZ did not inform about it either. These facts prove that the local authority failed to implement the support programme properly and monitor the process in overall, which allowed the failure of harvest resulting in increasing of food insecurity of the poorest farmers in hill regions.
After the media report, on December 3, the human rights groups including FIAN Nepal and the National Network on Right to Food submitted a memorandum to the FAO Nepal office calling for the responsibility and the guarantee of right to food of the marginalized farmers in these districts. Although the FAO Nepal office acknowledged their responsibility for this matter, no step for the compensation or relief for the affected farmers has been taken yet. The Government of Nepal who has an actual duty bearer to respect and fulfill of right to food as a state party of the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) has not taken any step for the immediate compensation and the long term policy. On the other hand, farmers may have to migrate to India seeking job with hunger stomach.
Food insecurity and child malnutrition in Baitadi and Doti districts:
Baitadi and Doti districts are located in the far western region of Nepal known as food deficit areas. According to the report of Central Bureau Statistics published in 2008-9, Baitadi district had food deficiency of 30,086 metric tons. According to the Nepal Nutrition and Food Security Bulletin, Helen Keller International, Nepal, 2010, in Baitadi district, prevalence of stunting, wasting, underweight and anemia among children were 61.7%, 45.7%, 10.4% and 29.6% respectively. Children from food insecure households were 51% more likely to be stunted compared to children from food secure households and mothers from food insecure. Households were 78 % more likely to be anemic compared to mothers from food secure households.
On December 16 2009, the European Commission and Council adopted the regulation no. 1337/2008 to establish the food facility. With financial support of over million Euros, the FAO in partnership with World Food programme and the Government of Nepal decided to provide inputs, to boost the crop production and increase food security for vulnerable families in hill regions. The FAO targeted Baitadi and Doti District for seed distribution. The seeds were distributed with the help of the local NGO.
The FAO Nepal has been refused the seeds recommended by the government and adopted other seeds instead since 2009. The National Agriculture Research Council (NARC) recommended two varieties of wheat seeds – W1204 and Annapurna – for Baitadi district in December 2009. The FAO Nepal however, distributed Gautami seed to 32 villages in October 2010 instead. It is uncertain that the farmers can succeed in harvesting the wheat, and the farmers are concerned about failure as seed distribution of the FAO previously brought out maize crop failure in jarkot in September 2010 and rice failure at present.
Seed security is directly related to the food security of farmers and in these two districts located hill region, high quality of seeds and sufficient irrigation are neither available nor accessible for these small scale farmers. In addition, the FAO and government provided the farmers with the seeds without testing variety. Whereas farmers were in queue to take seed with the hope of boosting production even as local seed were available in their hands.
In Nepal, the National Agriculture Policy 2004 has clearly stated that special incentives will be provided to the marginalized farmers and agriculture labors who own less than a hectare of land with adequate irrigation facilities. The Seed Act Policy, 2045 (1988) aims to maintain convenience and economic interest of the general public by providing seed of high quality in a well-planned manner up on producing , testing and processing to improve crop production, Several acts including the planned variety protection and farmers rights act have been drafted but have not been acted. The seed control centre is also responsible to enforce the availability of quality seed by enforcing the quality control mechanism to the farmers. Nepal is a member of the WTO (sub-section) and the agreement on the application of sanitary and phytosunitary measures have been signed.
SUGGESTED ACTION:
Please join us in expressing your concern for the poor farmers facing failure of harvest due to negligence of the government authorities and the FAO Nepal.
The AHRC has also written a separate letter calling for the intervention of the UN Special Rapporteurs on the Right to adequate food.
To support this case, please click here: SEND APPEAL LETTER
SAMPLE LETTER
Dear __________,
Nepal: Call for immediate compensation for the farmers facing food insecurity caused by the government agencies as well as the FAO Nepal
Name of the affected Area:
1. 12 villages of Doti district: Dand, Toleni, Gauguda, Tikhatar, Dhirkamandu, Waglek, Kathiwada, Pokhari, Gajari, Khirsen, Gairigaun, and Mankapadi
2. 36 villages of Baitadi District
Name of the victim:
Small scale-farmers who possess less than 0.3 hectares living in affected area
Name of the agencies involved in seed support:
1. Ministry of Agriculture
2. District Agriculture Development Office
3. FAO Nepal
Date of incident:
2010
I am writing to you to express concern about the small scale farmers living in hill region, Baitadi and Doti districts located far western region. I am informed that they are currently confronting food insecurity and hunger caused by the failure of rice crop that was expected to be harvested in November. The seeds were distributed by the FAO Nepal office collaborated with the government authorities such as Ministry of Agriculture and District Agriculture Development Office (DADO) to the targeted farmers who possess less than 0.3 hectares identified as vulnerable group facing food scarcity for three to six months through year.
I am informed that the FAO Nepal office distributed 89 metric tons of paddy seeds to 4633 households of 12 villages in Doti district and 68 metric tons to 6895 households of 36 villages in Batadi district in June 2010. Each household received 10 kilograms of seeds. After the media report on harvest failure in these districts on October 24, the District Agriculture Development Office (DADO) as well as the FAO started conducting an investigation. Till today, 363 households in Doti and 1100 in Baitadi were reportedly affected and more households would be expectedly discovered. Some farmers testified that the FAO Nepal failed to distribute the seeds in time and even worse, the seeds were not suitable for hill region. According to the agricultural season, May is the best time to plant rice-seeds and thus the farmers can harvest the crop four months later in hill region. Due to strike in May, the seeds distribution was delayed until 1st week of June.
The FAO Nepal also failed to adopt the rice-seeds recommended by the government agencies involved in the seeds support project, which is not the first time. In addition, the seeds were distributed to the relatives of the relevant officers more than 10 kilograms earmarked, and further to the farmers who are not the beneficiaries. The stories of the affected farmers describe how the government authority as well as the FAO Nepal has been neglecting its duty to respect, protect and fulfill the right to food.
One of the affected farmer, Mr. Shiva Raj Panta (50) living in Patan village of Baitadi district harvested nothing from his land and currently has nothing to eat at home. Before planting rice-seed, he used maize seed subsidized by the FAO which also led to failure. He has observed that some farmers who are allegedly relatives of the officers of the FAO or the German Technical Cooperation (GTZ) who is the partner agency for the seed support programme received 40 kilograms of seeds and those who were not entitled to receive the subsidy got the seed. They allegedly ate the rice-seeds as food instead of seeding. Another farmer, Mr. Mahadev Panta (55) received 30 kilograms of rice-seed, which was more than the earmarked. Panta also testified that if we used our local seed, we could have harvested 700 kilograms of rice at the minimum level. However, he harvested nothing from his land this year.
I have learned that at present, to manage their daily food, farmers try to take a loan from their neighbors or relatives but fail to get it as the festival has been just over. Despite this hazardous situation, the government has not yet taken any substantial step to secure their food security. Both of the FAO office and the DADO have been doing an investigation to identify the affected farmers since late October.
I am aware of the food insecurity and the child malnutrition in these districts. According to the report of Central Bureau Statistics published in 2008-9, Baitadi district had food deficiency of 30,086 metric tons. The Nepal Nutrition and Food Security Bulletin, Helen Keller International, Nepal, 2010, discovered that in Baitadi district, prevalence of stunting, wasting, underweight and anemia among children were 61.7%, 45.7%, 10.4% and 29.6% respectively. Children from food insecure households were 51% more likely to be stunted compared to children from food secure households and mothers from food insecure. Households were 78 % more likely to be anemic compared to mothers from food secure households. I am of the opinion that the failure of harvest may aggravate the child malnutrition.
I am of the opinion that the communication between the FAO and the government agencies was not properly carried out in order to make a plan and implement it. Both have been neglecting its duty failing to monitor the overall process in seeds distribution and cultivation. In February 2010, the consultation meeting was held among the DADO, District Project Coordination Committee (DDPC), and the FAO Nepal office. The DADO then recommended two varieties – Khumal 3 and 4 - out of four they listed for hill area. However, the DADO put Sabtri variety as a forth priority variety in the list, which is not even cultivable in hill region and in some reason, the FAO Nepal distributed Sabtri in Baidati district instead of Khumal 3 or 4 recommended by the DADO to the farmers. Sabtri requires about 140 days to be matured with more water as well as high temperature, which is not suitable for hill region but for plain region. In Doti District, the Radha-4 variety was distributed regardless the land level. It was cultivated in low land area but not in high land area.
After one meeting regarding seeds support between Ministry of Agriculture and FAO Nepal office in December 2009, the DADO at district level was given the authority to take responsibility for the seeds distribution and monitoring the process. When the (GTZ) informed the DADO of seeds distribution, the DADO did not make an inquiry about the variety for distribution and the GTZ did not inform about it either.
I am informed that on December 3, the human rights groups including FIAN Nepal and the National Network on Right to Food submitted a memorandum
to the FAO Nepal office calling for the responsibility and the guarantee of right to food of the marginalized farmers in these districts. Although the FAO Nepal office acknowledged their responsibility for this matter, no step for the compensation or relief for the affected farmers has been taken yet.
I am of the opinion that negligence of the FAO Nepal led the increase of food insecurity of the poor farmers in the affected areas. However, the government authorities rather failed to protect and fulfill the right to food as a state party of the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). I am of the opinion that the government authority as a duty bearer should monitor the implementation of the programs aiming to guarantee the right to food of the vulnerable farmers targeted. However, this case apparently proves that the authority fails to conduct its mandate.
I therefore, urge you to ensure the food security of the affected farmers in this case by;
1. Providing the immediate compensation for the affected farmers identified so that they should not migrate to India seeking job and food
2. Conducting thorough investigation into the implementation of seeds support program and publish the result in public
3. Taking a necessary action against those officers who are involved in corrupt practice or negligence shown in the case
4. Ensuring that the relevant government agencies should recommend the adequate seeds for hill region and should monitor its implementation next year.
I am also aware that Nepal has high poverty index according to the Multidimensional Poverty Index. I urge you to intervene to ensure the food security of the poor farmers in far western regions, which will contribute to achieve the Millennium Development Goals as well as to alleviate the poverty.
I look forward to your prompt response to the situation.
Yours sincerely,
----------------
PLEASE SEND YOUR LETTERS TO:
1. Mr. Madhav Kumar Nepal
Prime Minister
Office of the Prime Minister and Council of Nepal
Singh Durbar
Kathmandu
NEPAL
P.O. Box: 43312
Tel: + 977 1 421 1000
Fax: + 977 1 421 1086
Email: info@opmcm.gov.np
2. Mr. Mrigendra Kumar Singh Yadav
Minister
Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives
Singha Durbar,
Kathmandu
NEPAL
Tel: + 977 1 421 1706, 421 1950
Fax: + 977 1 421 1935
Email: memoac@moac.gov.np
3. Dr. Jagdish Chandra Pokharel
Vice-Chairperson
National Planning Commission
Singha Durbar,
Kathmandu,
NEPAL
Tel: + 977 1 422 9070, 421 1136
Fax: + 977 1 424 0171
Email: jcpokharel@npcnepal.gov.np
4. Mr.Hari Narayan Shah
General Manager
Nepal Food Corporation
Kathmandu
NEPAL
Tel: + 977 1 424 8883, 424 8891
Fax: + 977 1 426 2498
Email: khadya@wlink.com.np
5. Mrs.Jiwan Prava Lama
Director General
Department of Food Technology and Quality Control
Babarmahal, Kathamandu, Nepal
Tel: + 977 1 426 2741
Fax: + 977 1 426 2337
Email: info@dftqc.gov.np, dftqc@mail.com.np
6. Mr. Kedar Nath Upadhyay
Chairperson
National Human Rights Commission
Harihar Bhawan, Pulchowk, Lalitpur,
Kathmandu
NEPAL
G.P.O. Box: 9182,
Tel: + 977 1 501 0015
Fax: + 977 1 5547973
E-mail: nhrc@nhrcnepal.org
7. Mr. Murari Prasad Sharma
Chief Development Officer
District Administration Office,
Baitadi district,
Far Western Development Region,
NEPAL
8. Mr. Ram Lakhan Mandal
District Agriculture Development Office
Chief Agriculture Development Officer
Baitadi, Far Western Development Region,
NEPAL
9. Mr. Bhawani Parajuli
Chief Development Officer
District Administration Office,
Doti, Far Western Development Region,
NEPAL
10. Mr. Yagya Raj Joshi
District Agriculture Development Office
Chief Agriculture Development Officer
Doti district
Far Western Development Region
NEPAL
Fax: +977 94 42 0114
Thank you.
Right to Food Programme (foodjustice@ahrc.asia)
Asian Human Rights Commission (ua@ahrc.asia)