SRI LANKA: Eleven year-old child tortured by his class teacher at Vidiyartha College Kandy

ASIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION - URGENT APPEALS PROGRAMME

Urgent Appeal Case: AHRC-UAC-029-2017
ISSUES: Administration of justice, Child rights, Impunity, Rule of law,

Dear Friends,

The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) has received information from Mr. K M M G Sudath of No: 19/1, Watagoda Temple Road, Aruppola, Kandy, about maltreatment of his oldest son. His child was tortured and harassed by his class teacher. Though he lodged a complaint with the Police, they have not investigated these fundamental rights violations. Later, his father made a complaint to several Educational Authorities. However, no investigation has yet been initiated. Presently the boy is not attending school due to continued harassments. The parents of the child seek justice for him.

CASE NARRATIVE:

According to Sudath, his son (hereafter mentioned as ‘Child A’), is a student in grade 07 of Vidiyartha College Kandy. His younger brother is studying in grade 03 in the same school. Sudath is an entrepreneur who runs a small-scale business.

Child A’s class teacher, Ms. Himali Fernando, started harassing him because his parents were not in favor of the treasurer of the Parents’ Association. This parent held the position for many years without being held accountable.

On 16th February 2016, Child A, 11 years old, was assaulted by his class teacher with a CANE. She threatened to kill him if he said anything to his parents or any others about what was happening to him in her class. This beating was reported to the school Counselor. She was instrumental in covering up the incident and prevented the child from reporting it to the Principal.

However, the child’s mother noticed the scars on her child’s body while she was bathing him. The mother questioned the child about the scars. The child began to cry and spoke about the vindictiveness he suffered at the hands of his teacher. He specifically mentioned and identified the teacher by name. This entire incident was finally reported to the Principal. As a result, fearful? the class teacher Ms. Himali Fernando telephoned the child’s father and scolded him using filthy language.

His parents noticed that, with the continuing mental and physical harassment by the teacher, the child became discouraged in continuing his studies. He constantly expressed reluctance to attend school. After the Principal was informed about the harassments and the threats by the teacher, he did not take any positive measures to prevent this behavior in the future. No disciplinary action was taken against the teacher!

Finally, the parents decided to make a complaint to the Women & Child Bureau of the Kandy Headquarters Police Station. They lodged the complaint about the incident that took place on 16th February 2016, under reference W/CIB (2) 343/310. The parents of the child waited for the police authorities investigating the incident to take appropriate measures to provide justice for them. Needless to say, the complaint was neither investigated nor the accused warned. Instead, the police informed them that they were waiting for the Attorney General’s advice on how to proceed further with the case.

More than a month later, on the 30th March 2016, the Principal, Mr. Ranjith Rajapakse of Vidiyaratha College, called for a meeting of the School Development Board. All the parents also attended the meeting. In the meeting the Principal publicly accused the parents, of two students, who had complained to the police about a teacher. He said that the good name of the school was diminished. He specifically requested the parents to take some action against the parents of these two students. During his speech, he clearly referred to the names of Sudath, his wife and the names of their children as well. Both Sudath and his wife were present at the meeting and recorded the Principal’s entire speech. Sudath made a further complaint to the Kandy Headquarters Police Station on the incident and informed the police about future threats leveled at them and their children. The complaint was recorded by the police under reference ACFB (1) 209/59. However, as expected, this complaint has not yet been investigated.

Later, dissatisfied, the parents went to the Kandy Regional Human Rights Commission (HRC). 
Their complaint was recorded, reference HRC/K/187/17-A. The HRC has not initiated any investigation into the incident as of this date. Sudath made several other complaints to the Kandy Regional Director of Education and the Secretary of the Provincial Educational Ministry. He was looking for justice after his children and his family’s rights were violated. He made a suggestion to the authorities that they at least provide an alternative school for their children to continue their education. None of the above-mentioned authorities have started an investigation into his complaints.

Child A passed the scholarship exam in year 5. He was a competent child, excellent in his pursuit of educational and extra-curricula activities in the school. However, after experiencing the violent, unlawful series of incidents in school, he was reluctant to return there to study. At present, both of Sudath’s children are at home and not attending any school as a result of the clear violation of their basic rights to continue with their education. The Authorities, the Police and the Educational Department have continued the rights violations of the children by not investigating the crimes committed by the teacher and the Principal of the school. Sudath stated that the educational authorities are collectively working to protect their fellow teacher and the Principal of the school. His appeal for an alternative school for his two boys was rejected as well.

The rights of two children and their family were violated by the Educational and Police Authorities. The family demands justice.

SUGGESTED ACTION:

Please write a letter to the authorities listed below expressing two concerns about this case. First, request an immediate investigation into the allegations of child abuse by the named class teacher. Second, urge the prosecution of those proven to be responsible under the law, for misuse of the powers of the State. Any officers involved must be subject to an internal investigation for breach of department orders issued by the Police and Educational Departments. Request the National Police Commission and the Inspector General of Police to hold a special investigation into the malpractices of police officers who were abusing their power.

Please note that the Asian Human Rights Commission has also written a separate letter to the Chairman of the UN Child Rights Committee in this regard.

To support this case, please click here: SEND APPEAL LETTER

SAMPLE LETTER

Dear,

SRI LANKA: Eleven-year-old child tortured by his class teacher at Vidiyartha College Kandy

NameS of Victims:

1) Mr. K M M G Sudath of No: 19/1, Watagoda Temple Road, Aruppola, Kandy
2) The wife of Mr. K M M G Sudath
3) Two children of Mr. K M M G Sudath

Alleged perpetrators:

1) Teacher, Ms. Himali Fernando of the Vidiyartha College Kandy, 
2) The Principal of the Vidiyartha College Kandy
3) The Officer-in-Charge (OIC) of Headquarters Police Station of Kandy

Date of incidents: 16th February 2016 and continuously until now
Place of the incidents: Kandy Vidyartha College and the Kandy Police Division Headquarters

According to the information I have received from Mr. K M M G Sudath of No: 19/1, Watagoda Temple Road, Aruppola, Kandy his child was tortured and harassed by his class teacher. Though he lodged a complaint with the Police, they have not investigated these fundamental rights violations. Later, his father made a complaint to several Educational Authorities. However, no investigation has yet been initiated. Presently the boy is not attending school due to continued harassments. The parents of the child seek justice for him.

Sudath, his son (hereafter mentioned as ‘Child A’), is a student in grade 07 of Vidiyartha College Kandy. His younger brother is studying in grade 03 in the same school. Sudath is an entrepreneur who runs a small-scale business.

Child A’s class teacher, Ms. Himali Fernando, started harassing him because his parents were not in favor of the treasurer of the Parents’ Association. This parent held the position for many years without being held accountable.

On 16th February 2016, Child A, 11 years old, was assaulted by his class teacher with a CANE. She threatened to kill him if he said anything to his parents or any others about what was happening to him in her class. This beating was reported to the school Counselor. She was instrumental in covering up the incident and prevented the child from reporting it to the Principal.

However, the child’s mother noticed the scars on her child’s body while she was bathing him. The mother questioned the child about the scars. The child began to cry and spoke about the vindictiveness he suffered at the hands of his teacher. He specifically mentioned and identified the teacher by name. This entire incident was finally reported to the Principal. As a result, fearful? the class teacher Ms. Himali Fernando telephoned the child’s father and scolded him using filthy language.

His parents noticed that, with the continuing mental and physical harassment by the teacher, the child became discouraged in continuing his studies. He constantly expressed reluctance to attend school. After the Principal was informed about the harassments and the threats by the teacher, he did not take any positive measures to prevent this behavior in the future. No disciplinary action was taken against the teacher!

Finally, the parents decided to make a complaint to the Women & Child Bureau of the Kandy Headquarters Police Station. They lodged the complaint about the incident that took place on 16th February 2016, under reference W/CIB (2) 343/310. The parents of the child waited for the police authorities investigating the incident to take appropriate measures to provide justice for them. Needless to say, the complaint was neither investigated nor the accused warned. Instead, the police informed them that they were waiting for the Attorney General’s advice on how to proceed further with the case.

More than a month later, on the 30th March 2016, the Principal, Mr. Ranjith Rajapakse of Vidiyaratha College, called for a meeting of the School Development Board. All the parents also attended the meeting. In the meeting the Principal publicly accused the parents, of two students, who had complained to the police about a teacher. He said that the good name of the school was diminished. He specifically requested the parents to take some action against the parents of these two students. During his speech, he clearly referred to the names of Sudath, his wife and the names of their children as well. Both Sudath and his wife were present at the meeting and recorded the Principal’s entire speech. Sudath made a further complaint to the Kandy Headquarters Police Station on the incident and informed the police about future threats leveled at them and their children. The complaint was recorded by the police under reference ACFB (1) 209/59. However, as expected, this complaint has not yet been investigated.

Later, dissatisfied, the parents went to the Kandy Regional Human Rights Commission (HRC). 
Their complaint was recorded, reference HRC/K/187/17-A. The HRC has not initiated any investigation into the incident as of this date. Sudath made several other complaints to the Kandy Regional Director of Education and the Secretary of the Provincial Educational Ministry. He was looking for justice after his children and his family’s rights were violated. He made a suggestion to the authorities that they at least provide an alternative school for their children to continue their education. None of the above-mentioned authorities have started an investigation into his complaints.

Child A passed the scholarship exam in year 5. He was a competent child, excellent in his pursuit of educational and extra-curricula activities in the school. However, after experiencing the violent, unlawful series of incidents in school, he was reluctant to return there to study. At present, both of Sudath’s children are at home and not attending any school as a result of the clear violation of their basic rights to continue with their education. The Authorities, the Police and the Educational Department have continued the rights violations of the children by not investigating the crimes committed by the teacher and the Principal of the school. Sudath stated that the educational authorities are collectively working to protect their fellow teacher and the Principal of the school. His appeal for an alternative school for his two boys was rejected as well.

The rights of two children and their family were violated by the Educational and Police Authorities. The family demands justice.

I request the intervention of your good offices. Ensure that the authorities listed below open an immediate investigation into the allegations of violations of fundamental rights of the victims by officers of the Sri Lanka Police Department and a teacher in the Educational Department. Any officers involved should be subject to an internal investigation for breach of Police Department Orders.

Yours sincerely,

——————— 
PLEASE SEND YOUR LETTERS TO:

1. Mr. Pujith Jayasundara 
Inspector General of Police 
New Secretariat 
Colombo 1 
SRI LANKA 
Fax: +94 11 2 440440 / 327877 
E-mail: igp@police.lk

2. Mr. Jayantha Jayasooriya PC 
Attorney General 
Attorney General’s Department 
Colombo 12 
SRI LANKA 
Fax: +94 11 2 436421 
E-mail: ag@attorneygeneral.gov.lk

3. Secretary 
National Police Commission 
3rd Floor, Rotunda Towers 
109 Galle Road 
Colombo 03 
SRI LANKA 
Tel: +94 11 2 395310 
Fax: +94 11 2 395867 
E-mail: npcgen@sltnet.lk or polcom@sltnet.lk

4. Secretary 
Human Rights Commission 
No. 36, Kynsey Road 
Colombo 8 
SRI LANKA 
Tel: +94 11 2 694 925 / 673 806 
Fax: +94 11 2 694 924 / 696 470 
E-mail: sechrc@sltnet.lk

Thank you.

Urgent Appeals Programme
Asian Human Rights Commission (ua@ahrc.asia)

Document Type : Urgent Appeal Case
Document ID : AHRC-UAC-029-2017
Countries : Sri Lanka,
Issues : Administration of justice, Child rights, Impunity, Rule of law,