Dear friends,
The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) has received information about the alleged police assault of a 57-year-old woman in East Denpasar, Indonesia after she was arrested on 3 January 2007 by the police, on suspicion of counterfeiting money, the charge of which she denies. The victim was severely assaulted by police officers and has lodged a complaint about the violent assault to the Provost Unit on Profession and Security of Police (Provost PROPAM) through her husband. However no appropriate action has been taken by the authorities for the alleged assault. The victim is still in police custody after 20 days and her safety and security is a matter of grave concern.
CASE DETAILS:
According to the information we have received, Mrs. Ni Ketut Suratni (57), was arrested by East Denpasar Police Sector in Bali on 3 January 2007 when she was shopping in market, suspected of counterfeiting money valued at Rp.50,000 (USD 6) that she paid at the market. She denied her involvement in the crime but she was taken to the East Denpasar Police Sector in Bali as they were suspicious about her connection with the counterfeiting network. Despite the lapse of almost three weeks her charge is still under scrutiny by police.
During the evening of January 3, when the victims son Mr. Gede Ananta went to the police station to see her, he found that her right cheek was badly swollen and that she appeared to have been struck about the face many times. The victims son asked his mother about the injury and she replied that she had been severely hit and kicked by two police officers, Bripka I Made Wiguna (Police ID: 68010139) and Brigadier Erwin Suprayoga (Police ID: 76100156) during the interrogation.
On January 11, Mr. I Wayan Gangsar, the victim’s husband, reported the case to Propam Polda Bali (Provost Unit on Profession and Security of Police of Police Province Bali), the special unit of the police agency to investigate police misconduct. On the night of January 11, the victim was examined by public medical doctors at the police hospital for a visum et repertum, a medical report for injury case that was then issued by public medical doctors. However, the medical report did not clearly identify the injuries on the victim as having been caused by beating.
The victim’s lawyers then submitted a request for another medical examination for visum et repertum by independent doctors as the previous medical report had been issued by doctors from the police hospital. The second examination for the report has not been conducted yet.
The victim is still under detention in the above mentioned police station and no official investigation has taken place into the alleged assault of the victim by police officers despite the fact that the complaint was made to the Propam Polda, Bali on January 11.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
To our regret, the brutal violation of rights of ordinary citizens in Indonesia including arbitrary arrest, detention and torture is widely practiced in Indonesia as in the case of Mrs. Ni Ketut Suratni.
There are no laws which effectively prohibit the torture as a crime and prosecute perpetrators under Indonesian laws. Torture is a criminal offence under the Government Regulation No.27 of 1983 on the Implementation of the Law of Criminal procedure whereas the existing penal code does not prescribe torture as criminal offence.
The AHRC has reported cases of the poor quality of judicial proceedings as well as execution of torture perpetrators in Indonesia (see further UA-215-2006 and UA-312-2006).
The AHRC condemns the alleged brutal police assault of the victim in custody as a clear violation of the principles in the Convention against Torture (CAT), of which Indonesia is party.
The lengthy detention period that is prescribed under the Criminal Procedure Code No.8 of 1981 (KUHAP) is another concern of the AHRC for this case. According to the KUHAP, after 24 hour hours of detention after the arrest is exhausted, initial detention order of 20 days can be issued by the police and it can be extended by a prosecutor for another 40 days for further investigation (section 21 and 24 of the KUHAP). It means a person arrested can be detained for 61 days in total without any judicial review about the legality of his/her detention. Under the said Criminal Procedure Code, there is no requirement that a person who is arrested or detained be brought promptly before a judge or other judicial officer. The AHRC is concerning about such lengthy detention period before presenting a person before a prosecutor or judge under the Criminal Procedure Code of Indonesia could cause risks of further human rights violation such as torture or ill-treatment and disappearances.
Furthermore, such a long pre-trial detention also violates the rights of victim to challenge the legality of the detention, while the victim is denying her involvement into the suspected crime in this case. In absence of such a procedure, persons arrested are detained for significant periods of time without being afforded a review of the legality of his/her detention under the under the current legislation in Indonesia.
Those rights are provided under article 9 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) to which the Indonesian government is party, and we condemn that the Indonesian governments irresponsible attitude constitutes violation of principles provided by the ICCPR.
We therefore call for the immediate release of the victim from police custody and a thorough investigation into the facts of police assault, especially the two police officers who have been identified their name by the victim. Also we demand that the medical report would be resubmitted by independent doctors who are not from police hospitals so that the medical report would not be manipulated by the authorities thereby concealing the fact of police assault during detention.
SUGGESTED ACTION:
Please write letters to the authorities listed below, asking their immediate action to investigate the alleged assault of the victim by two police officers. Please also demand immediate release of victim from police custody, and to provide all necessary assistance to the victim and her family to pursue legal remedies.
To support this case, please click here: SEND APPEAL LETTER
SAMPLE LETTER
Dear_________,
INDONESIA: Woman severely injured by brutal assault in detention by police in East Denpasar
Name of the victim: Mrs. Ni Ketut Suratni (57), the resident of Jln. Sulatri No. 29 Kesiman Petilan Village, East Denpasar, Bali
Name of alleged perpetrators:
1. Chief Brigadier I MADE WIGUNA, Police ID: 68010139
2. Brigadier ERWIN SUPRAYOGA, Police ID: 76100156
Place of the incident: East Denpasar Police Sector in Bali
Period of detention: From 3 January 2007 to date
I am writing to you to express my grave concern about an alleged police assault of Mrs. Ni Ketut Suratni (57) after she was arrested by East Denpasar Police Sector in Bali on 3 January 2007.
According to the information I have received, the victim was arrested after being suspected of counterfeiting money of valued Rp. 50,000, acrime of which she denies her involvement. In the evening of the same day she was arrested the victims son went to the police station to see her and he found that she had wounds, especially on her right cheek. The victims son had asked his mother about the wounds and she stated that she had been assaulted by the two police officers, Bripka I Made Wiguna (Police ID: 68010139) and Brigadier Erwin Suprayoga (Police ID: 76100156). Also these police officers kicked the victims back several times.
On January 11, Mr. I Wayan Gangsar, the husband of the victim reported the case to Propam Polda Bali (Provost Unit on Profession and Security of Police in Police Province Bali), special unit of the police agency to investigate police misconducts. On the night of January 11, the victim was examined by medial doctors from the police hospital for a visum et repertum, a medical report for injury case issued by public medical doctors. According to the information I have received, the medical report did not clearly state the suspicion of police assault that caused severe injury to the victim.
Later on the lawyers of the victim had submitted a request of another medical examination for visum et repertum by independent doctors who are not from police hospital as the previous medical report was issued by doctors from police hospital. And the second examination for the report has not been conducted yet.
The victim has still been under detention in the above mentioned police station, and there were no official investigation taken into the alleged assault of the victim by police officers after complaint was made to the Propam Polda Bali.
As far as I have learned, there are no laws that effectively prohibit the torture as a crime and prosecute perpetrators under Indonesian laws. Torture is a criminal offence under the Government Regulation No.27 of 1983 on the Implementation of the Law of Criminal procedure however the existing penal code does not prescribe torture as criminal offence.
I am concerned that toleration of such grave human rights violations by public authorities would further encourage impunities among the law-enforcement authorities and officials including the police officers of Indonesia. The audacious character of such practice gravely degrade human dignity and furthermore violate the international human rights laws such as Convention Against Torture (CAT) and International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) to which the government of Indonesia is party to the both treaties.
I have also learned that a lengthy detention period presenting a person before a prosecutor or judge is prescribed in under the Criminal Procedure Code No.8 of 1981 (KUHAP). According to the KUHAP, after 24 hour hours of detention after the arrest is exhausted, initial detention order of 20 days can be issued by the police and it can be extended by a prosecutor for another 40 days for further investigation (section 21 and 24 of the KUHAP). It means a person arrested can be detained for 61 days in total without any judicial review about the legality of his/her detention.
I am gravely concerned that such lengthy detention period which is prescribed by the Criminal Procedure Code of Indonesia could cause risks of further human rights violation to the victim of this case such as torture or ill-treatment. I also have an opinion that that such a long pre-trial detention without judicial review also violates the rights of victim to challenge the legality of the detention. In absence of such a procedure, persons arrested are detained for significant periods of time without being afforded a review of the legality of his/her detention under the under the current legislation in Indonesia.
The right to access challenge the legality of detention and the right to be promptly brought before a judge or other judicial power are provided under Article 9 of the ICCPR to which the Indonesia is a state party. I condemn that the Indonesian government is irresponsible to their obligation as a party state to the ICCPR for failing to fulfil the principles provided under Article 9 of the ICCPR.
I therefore urge your immediate action for a thorough investigation into the fact of the police assault on the victim if the case, especially the two police officers who have been identified the names by the victim. The victim should be brought before the court immediately and the legality of her detention should be reviewed by the court. I also request you to take action to release the victim if there is no sufficient evident to link her with the alleged money falsification activities. I also request you to ensure that the police authority arrange another medical examination by the independent doctors as requested by the victims lawyers.
Furthermore I request the Government of Indonesia to introduce a law criminalising torture at any occasion in accordance with the Convention against Torture (CAT) in order to prevent torture cases in the future. Finally I also urge you to take all necessary actions for the victim and her family to be provided all necessary assistance including adequate compensation.
I look forward your prompt intervention in this case.
Yours sincerely,
—————-
PLEASE SEND YOUR LETTER TO:
1.Mr. Abdul Rahman Saleh
Attorney General
Kejaksaan Agung RI
Jl. Sultan Hasanuddin No. 1
Jakarta Selatan
INDONESIA
Tel: + 62 21 7221337, 7397602
Fax: + 62 21 7250213
2. Gen. Sutanto
Chief of National Police
Jl. Trunojoyo No. 3
Jakarta Selatan
INDONESIA
Tel: +62 21 721 8012
Fax: +62 21 720 7277
3. Mr. Susilo Bambang Yudoyono
President
Republic of Indonesia
Presidential Palace
Jl. Medan Merdeka Utara
Jakarta Pusat 10010
INDONESIA
Tel: + 62 21 3845627 ext 1003
Fax: + 62 21 231 41 38, 345 2685, 345 7782
4. Mr. Agung Laksono
Chief of the Indonesian House of Representative
Gedung DPR/MPR RI
Jl. Gatot Subroto No. 6
Jakarta
INDONESIA
Tel: + 62 21 5715509; 5715344; 5715621
Fax: + 62 21 5714469, 5734389
5. Mr. Hamid Awaluddin
Minister of Justice and Human Rights
Uahi Utoyo Usman S.H.
Menteri Kehkiman
JI. H.R. Rosuna Said Kav. 6-7
Kuningan, Jakarta Selatan
INDONESIA
Fax: +62 21 525 3095
6. Mr. Abdul Hakim Garuda Nusantara
Chairperson
KOMNAS HAM
Jl. Latuharhary No. 4B Menteng
Jakarta Pusat 10310
INDONESIA
Tel: +62 21 3925230
Fax: +62 21 3151042/3925227
7. Prof. Manfred Nowak
Special Rapporteur on the Question of Torture
Attn: Safir Syed
c/o OHCHR-UNOG
1211 Geneva 10
SWITZERLAND
Tel: +41 22 917 9230
Fax: +41 22 917 9016 (ATTN: SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR TORTURE)
Thank you.
Urgent Appeal Programme
Asian Human Rights Commission (ahrchk@ahrchk.org)
