INDIA: Yet another attack on human rights activist in Belwa village, Uttar Pradesh 

Dear friends,

The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) has received information regarding an attack on Mr. Issuk Ali, a human rights activist associated with the Peoples’ Vigilance Committee on Human Rights (PVCHR). He was visiting a primary school in the Belwa village in Varanasi to make enquiries into the Mid Day Meal scheme. However, his investigation ceased after he was assaulted and forced to leave the school. Subsequently, his father was threatened and verbally abused by the head of Belwa village and when Issuk Ali went to lodge his complaint at the police station, the police refused to record it down without giving any reason. This incident greatly concerns the AHRC because it is not the first time that human rights activists have been attacked in the district of Varansi, which speaks to the dangerous situation human rights defenders are in.

On 18 February 2006, Mr. Issuk Ali visited a primary school in Belwa village under the Badagoan Block of Phulpur police station in Varanasi District in connection with a project he was working on. He had been visiting this primary school for the past three days to make enquiries on the execution of the Mid Day Meal programme. The project was to ensure the implementation of different schemes at the ground level, and to educate the children and community about their rights.

From his visit he found that the meals distributed for the children did not conform with the standards set down by the Supreme Court; there were no pulses included in the Khichdi (Indian dish consisting of mainly rice and lentils) that was served.

Issuk Ali suspected malpractices in the food distribution and has confirmation that much of the food intended to be cooked and distributed among the students, obtained free of cost from the government, is sold in open market through grocery shops. The cook as well as the village head of Belwa and the local police are suspected to gain illegal profits from this sale. He also found that the woman who was appointed as cook was an upper caste Hindu.

When Issuk Ali tried to gather more information from the children and the teachers in the school about the quality of the Mid Day Meal, a man, claiming to be the cook’s brother came and assaulted Issuk Ali. The man forced Issuk Ali to leave the school and threatened that if he ever came again he would be killed. Soon after Issuk Ali left the school, a group of 8 men led by the head of Belwa village, Mr. Rajendra Tiwari, went in search of him. They first went to the school and then to Issuk Ali’s house. Only finding Issuk Ali’s father in the house, they began to insult him, shouting filthy abuse at him and warning him to keep his son under control otherwise father and son would face the consequences.

Due to the aggressive threats against himself and his father, Issuk Ali went to Phulpur police station to file a complaint against the perpetrators. However, the police refused to record the complaint and they refused to give any reasons.

The AHRC is extremely disappointed that the police have refused to take any action against the perpetrators or to offer protection to Issuk Ali. What makes this case even more frustrating is the fact that this is not the first case the AHRC have highlighted regarding threats to human rights activists in Varansi. (please refer to
UA-138-2005; UP-95-2005; UP-100-2005; and UP-166-2005) Furthermore, there have been numerous accounts of Mr. Tiwari and his gang threatening human rights activists in Belwa village and yet no action or accountability has been placed upon them. The fact that the police refused to record the complaint is in direct violation of the UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders 1998 which includes provisions that human rights defenders whose rights are violated must have access to avenues of redress (Article 9).

It is surprising to note that even after cases of similar nature was brought to the attention of the Government of India personally by the victims and also by the UN, no steps whatsoever has been taken by the Indian authorities to curb the attack on human rights defenders in India, Belwa in particular. This case is further proof as to how corrupt policing and neglect by the Indian authorities, particularly in remote villages which is home to 70% of Indians, and lack of proper laws and failure of implementation of existing laws culminates in absolute failure of rule of law in India.

The situation in Belwa and neighbouring villages is such that the might of the upper caste is prevailing over those working for human rights in the area. Human rights activists are fearful for their lives, particularly since the local administration has not yet extended their support in preserving law and order in the region. The immediate retaliation of the caste Hindus with the support of the local civil administration is to suppress any act that might liberate the dalits and backward community from their servitude.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:

The mid-day meal scheme is the popular name for free school meal programme in India. It involves provision of lunch free of cost to school-children on all working days. The key objectives of the programme are: protecting children from classroom hunger, increasing school enrolment and attendance, improved socialisation among children belonging to all castes, addressing malnutrition, and social empowerment through provision of employment to women. The scheme has a long history especially in Tamil Nadu and Gujarat, and has been expanded to all parts of India after a landmark direction by the Supreme Court of India on November 28, 2001. The success of this scheme is illustrated by the tremendous increase in the school participation and completion rates in Tamil Nadu.

SUGGESTED ACTION:

Please send a letter to the relevant authorities listed below and urge them to take immediate action to arrest the alleged perpetrators and provide protection to human rights defenders at threat. Please ensure that strong disciplinary/criminal action is taken against police officers who failed in their duty to take action and investigate the case.
——————————————————