SRI LANKA: Assault and fabrication of charges by the Poddala Police 

ASIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION - URGENT APPEALS PROGRAMME

Urgent Appeal Case: UA-240-2006
ISSUES: Police violence,

Dear friends,

The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) has come to learn of a case involving the fabricated charges of a man, owing to the line of work he is engaged in. Though the police have charged the victim with possessing ganja (marijuana), he maintains that he was charged because of the illicit mining conducted by his employer who frequently has to bribe the police to continue in their activities. Though the victim is out on bail, he is still facing serious charges which is entirely unacceptable given that they are fabricated.

On 8 February 2006, at about 7pm, Damith Kumara had stopped at a three-wheel park to chat with a friend. At that time, the Poddala police OIC together with another policeman—both in civvies—approached in a jeep. The OIC alighted from the jeep and shouted, “You two, come here immediately”. Both Mr. Kumara and his friend walked up to the OIC.

As they drew near, the OIC slapped both men hard across their faces. They were then forced into the jeep and taken to the Poddala police station. Neither was informed about the reasons for their arrest. At the station they were taken to the OIC’s room. He consulted a piece of paper and asked their names. When they told him their names, he said Mr. Kumara’s name was on the list and instructed the policemen to detain Mr. Kumara and release his friend.

The OIC proceeded to assault and harass Mr. Kumara. He then instructed another policeman to ‘book Mr. Kumara for drugs’. Mr. Kumara was then locked in a holding cell. Although he repeatedly requested to know what the charges were against him, the police refused to tell him. The next day at about 8am a policeman entered the cell with an envelope and demanded that Mr. Kumara put his fingerprint on the cover. Mr. Kumara complied due to fear. Then, at about 11am, he was produced before the Galle Magistrate’s Court and it was only there he discovered that he had been charged with possessing ganja (marijuana) and fabricated case No. 65617 had been laid against him. However, despite being terrified, Mr. Kumara insisted on pleading not guilty to the charges filed against him and accordingly was released on bail.

According to Mr. Kumara, his mother is ailing and thus he is forced to work for a sand mining mudalali (businessman)—one of the few casual jobs available in his home town. It is noteworthy that the businessmen obtain a license to mine for sand several days a week but in reality, they engage in illicit mining throughout the week. This is often done in collusion with the area police who are heavily bribed to ‘look the other side’. However every once in a while, the police arrest a worker, produce him in court and fine him—the fine being paid by the owner. But the businessman is never arrested and the illicit activity continues unabated. Sometimes, the businessman is required to ‘give a case’ to the police, i.e. send a worker to the police to be charged, plead guilty before court and to pay the requisite fine. This way, the police ensure they are not pulled up by superiors for ‘not taking action’ against illegal activities.

According to Mr. Kumara, though the police had on several occasions attempted to arrest him, he had always managed to evade this. Even his employer had not requested him to go to the police ‘with a case’. He therefore believes that the police fabricated the ‘ganja charge’ against him in order to somehow ‘teach him a lesson’.

Mr. Kumara urges that the authorities take immediate action against the Poddala police and ensure that the fabricated charges against him are withdrawn and that he is not further harassed. He also urges that immediate disciplinary and legal action be taken against the errant policemen.

Janasansadaya, the human rights organisation who is currently assisting Mr. Kumara has already notified the Human Rights Commission, the National Police Commission, the Inspector General of Police and the Attorney General about this shameful incident and hope that these institutions take necessary action to ensure that justice is done.

SUGGESTED ACTION:

Please write to the relevant authorities listed below seeking their intervention in ensuring that the fabricated charges laid against the victim are withdrawn. Legal and disciplinary legal action should be taken against those police officers who laid the charges or were in anyway involved in this incident.

To support this appeal, please click: 

 

To support this case, please click here: SEND APPEAL LETTER

SAMPLE LETTER

Dear ______________,

SRI LANKA: Assault and fabrication of charges by the Poddala Police

Name of victim: B Damith Kumara, 22 years, unmarried. Occupation: casual labourer; Address: Amugoda, Galle
Name of alleged perpetrators: Poddala police
Date of incident: 8 February 2006

I write seeking your intervention in ensuring that fabricated charges laid against a man are withdrawn at once. According to the information I have received, B Damith Kumara was picked up by the Poddala police on 8 February 2006 and without being given any reason for his arrest, was later charged with possessing ganja. On February 9 he was produced before the Galle Magistrates Court where his charges were filed under case no. 65617. Despite being terrified, Mr. Kumara insisted on pleading not guilty to the charges filed against him and accordingly was released on bail.

According to Mr. Kumara, who works for a sand mining mudalali (businessman), illicit mining goes on everyday in his area. This is often done in collusion with the area police who are heavily bribed to take no action against the illicit mining. However, every once in a while, the police arrest a worker, produce him in court and fine him—the fine being paid by the owner. But the businessman is never arrested and the illicit activity continues unabated. Sometimes, the businessman is required to ‘give a case’ to the police, i.e. send a worker to the police to be charged, plead guilty before court and to pay the requisite fine. This way, the police ensure they are not pulled up by superiors for ‘not taking action’ against illegal activities.

According to Mr. Kumara, though the police had on several occasions attempted to arrest him, he had always managed to evade them. Even his employer had not requested him to go to the police ‘with a case’. He therefore believes that the police fabricated the ‘ganja charge’ against him in order to somehow ‘teach him a lesson’.

Mr. Kumara urges that the authorities take immediate action against the Poddala police and ensure that the fabricated charges against him are withdrawn and that he is no longer harassed. He also urges that immediate disciplinary and legal action be taken against the errant policemen.

I support Mr. Kumara in his plea for justice and ask that the relevant authorities intervene immediately so that the fabricated charges against him are withdrawn and that legal and disciplinary action is taken against the police officers involved.

Yours sincerely,

—————-
PLEASE SEND YOUR LETTERS TO:

1. Mr. Chandra Fernando
Inspector General of Police
New Secretariat
Colombo 1
SRI LANKA
Fax: +94 11 2 440440/327877
Email: chandralaw@police.lk

2. Mr. K. C. Kamalasabesan
Attorney General
Attorney General’s Department
Colombo 12
SRI LANKA
Fax: +94 11 2 436421
Email: attorney@sri.lanka.net

3. Secretary
Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka
No. 36, Kynsey Road
Colombo 8
SRI LANKA
Tel: +94 11 2 694 925 / 673 806
Fax: +94 11 2 694 924 / 696 470
E-mail: sechrc@sltnet.lk

4. Secretary
National Police Commission
3rd Floor, Rotunda Towers,
109 Galle Road
Colombo 03
SRI LANKA
Tel: +94 11 2 395310
Fax: +94 11 2 395867
E-mail: polcom@sltnet.lk

5. Piyasena Ranasinghe
Director General
Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption
36, Malalasekera Mawatha
Colombo 07
SRI LANKA
Tel: +94 11 2 586 851
Fax: +94 11 2 595 045

6. Ms. Leila Zerrougui
Chairperson
Working Group on arbitrary detention
Attn: Mr. Miguel de la Lama
C/o OHCHR-UNOG
1211 Geneva 10
SWITZERLAND
Fax: +41 22 917 9006 (ATTN: WORKING GROUP ARBITRARY DETENTION)

Thank you.

Urgent Appeal Programme
Asian Human Rights Commission (ahrchk@ahrchk.org)

Document Type : Urgent Appeal Case
Document ID : UA-240-2006
Countries : Sri Lanka,
Issues : Police violence,