PHILIPPINES: Eviction of impoverished farmers in Barangay Talomo

PHILIPPINES: Land rights; Loss of land and deprivation of livelihood

——————————————————————–

The following urgent appeal is based on information received from the Task Force Detainees of the Philippines (TFDP). It combines information from a recent urgent appeal of theirs and two updates to it. Please show solidarity with the farmers in the Philippines who are losing their land and livelihood.

CASE DETAILS

Seventeen impoverished farmers from Barangay Talomo, Sto. Tomas, Davao del Norter, Philippines have been evicted on August 8, 2002. This was in an area of contested land of about 23.4676 hectares. Prior to these farmers’ entry, they say the area was a cogonal, forested, and uncultivated land. These farmers first entered the land between 1972 and 1986 and took possession of the land in 1987.

These farmers have been struggling to earn a living to feed their children. They must often borrow from traders outside of harvest season or even during harvest season if their crops fail. Each of the seventeen farmers, generally supporting a number of children, cultivated land ranging from a fraction of a hectare up to two hectares, planted with such plants and trees as banana, coconut, mango, and jackfruit, as well as engaging in rice farming.

It is reported that in 1987, some persons arrived and introduced themselves as the heirs of the owner of the land, although they told the farmers they could keep cultivating. These persons, heirs of Paulino Lopez, submitted a petition to President Aquino in 1987 for a portion of patented land under the name of Paulino Lopez, covered by Lot No. 12, CAD-284 without title covering an area of 23.4676 hectares for CARP coverage. This land was titled among the heirs of Paulino Lopez based on a Homestead patent title from Homestead Application No. 233180 O.C.T. No. (P-2278) P-541 in the name of Paulino Lopez.

This land has now been in dispute for years. The heirs of Paulino Lopez brought a civil case, which resulted in the Regional Trial Court making an order against the farmers in 1995, affirmed by the Court of Appeal in 2001. On 5 July 2002, the farmers received a notice to vacate from the Sheriff of Panabo City. The Sheriff delivered this to only one person, which resulted in some confusion.

On 8 August 2002, it is reported that a convoy of around 200 people, including police, private security guards, and members of the military not in uniform arrived to carry out the demolition. There were attempts at negotiation. After some time, the sheriff refused to give any more time for negotiation and got a team to spray the farmers with tear gas. In the early afternoon, the municipal mayor arrived, and there was a new round of negotiations. This gave the farmers fifteen days to relocate.

During these next fifteen days, about ten security guards of the alleged landowner were placed into the area. They were reportedly armed with armalite rifles and shotguns.

On August 24,2002, the day after the 15 days expired, some hired workers of the landowners accompanied by the their security guards, reportedly used chainsaws to destroy the plants of the farmers, other fruit trees, and trees which are the evidence of their long occupation in the area.

The farmers’s houses, other than one demolished before, are still in place. Some say the landowner may have sensed that it would be questionable to remove illegally the houses of the farmers, because the court failed to issue an order of demolition up to this point. On 26 August 2002, some hired workers of the alleged landowners reportedly fenced the entrance gate of the area where the houses of the farmers are located, and the farmers were driven out. On 26-27 August 2002, some hired workers of the alleged landowners reportedly brought three chainsaws, and more trees and plants of the farmers were destroyed.

According to TFDP, the acquisition of the land by Paulino Lopez and his heirs was based on fraud. The acquisition of the Homestead Certificate of Title of Paulino Lopez was tainted with fraud, misrepresentation, and irregularity, because he could not have complied with the residence and cultivation requirements of the Homestead Law. At the time he was supposed to be residing on the land, he was reportedly residing in Davao City, and it is too far from the contested land.

According to TFDP, Paulino Lopez made a misrepresentation in his final proof of application for a Homestead Patent because he said in his application that he built a house and he had cultivated the area. But according to witnesses who were living in the place for quite some time, they stated that neither Paulino Lopez nor his heirs had done this. They had not cultivated the land. They had not introduced any improvements. There were no traces of cultivation ever having been made before the farmers came. The title holder and his transferees had never exercised acts of possession as appropriate to the concept of an owner, because they have never complied with the minimum requirements of residence and cultivation provided for in the Public Land Act.

Today, the farmers who have been living on this land and supporting their families for decades are being chased out. Their livelihoods and their very lives are at risk.
 

SUGGESTED ACTION

Please send your appeal to the Filipino authorities to urge them to take action on the ownership of this land.
 

 

 

To support this case, please click here: SEND APPEAL LETTER